<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CIL2009: Moving Libraries to the Cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matthewdhamilton.com/2009/04/06/cil2009-moving-libraries-to-the-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matthewdhamilton.com/2009/04/06/cil2009-moving-libraries-to-the-cloud/</link>
	<description>The Brewin&#039; Librarian... always a new idea in the fermenter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://matthewdhamilton.com/2009/04/06/cil2009-moving-libraries-to-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewdhamilton.com/wp/?p=223#comment-61</guid>
		<description>This presentation was thought provoking. A lot of people summed it up as &quot;oh, OCLC wants to own all of our data&quot;. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s entirely an inaccurate assessment, but I also think there is some merit to what they were suggesting-- that a lot of processes are the same in libraries the whole world over, and it makes sense to scale them to the web in such a way that libraries can focus on service provision-- not on everyone cataloging, marking, maintaining an OPAC, etc. Also-- I liked his point about how we would turn up in search engines more if we banded our resources together, but because we&#039;re so fractured we don&#039;t appear as the resource of choice.

I think what you&#039;re talking about would be different, and yes-- I do think there is room for more cloud computing presentations at library conferences. I would probably go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This presentation was thought provoking. A lot of people summed it up as &#8220;oh, OCLC wants to own all of our data&#8221;. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s entirely an inaccurate assessment, but I also think there is some merit to what they were suggesting&#8211; that a lot of processes are the same in libraries the whole world over, and it makes sense to scale them to the web in such a way that libraries can focus on service provision&#8211; not on everyone cataloging, marking, maintaining an OPAC, etc. Also&#8211; I liked his point about how we would turn up in search engines more if we banded our resources together, but because we&#8217;re so fractured we don&#8217;t appear as the resource of choice.</p>
<p>I think what you&#8217;re talking about would be different, and yes&#8211; I do think there is room for more cloud computing presentations at library conferences. I would probably go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fink</title>
		<link>http://matthewdhamilton.com/2009/04/06/cil2009-moving-libraries-to-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewdhamilton.com/wp/?p=223#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Did you like this presentation?  Was it too OCLC heavy?  Did you come away with a pretty solid understanding of cloud stuff?  I am considering making a presentation proposal on cloud computing both in general and also how I did something at my local institution, but don&#039;t know if it&#039;s something people would dig or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you like this presentation?  Was it too OCLC heavy?  Did you come away with a pretty solid understanding of cloud stuff?  I am considering making a presentation proposal on cloud computing both in general and also how I did something at my local institution, but don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s something people would dig or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

